<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for anothernicole</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anothernicole.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anothernicole.com</link>
	<description>anotherblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 07:15:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Uncivil Servant: Thoughts on My Interview with Loretta Sanchez by Susanna</title>
		<link>http://anothernicole.com/2012/04/27/an-uncivil-servant-thoughts-on-my-interview-with-loretta-sanchez/#comment-2023</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susanna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 07:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anothernicole.com/?p=7912#comment-2023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OH MY BOLDNESS! Dude, you were amazing to keep going after that brick wall...
Vote for Miss Robichaux is what I say! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH MY BOLDNESS! Dude, you were amazing to keep going after that brick wall&#8230;<br />
Vote for Miss Robichaux is what I say! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Ride All the Rides in Disneyland in a Day by Susanna</title>
		<link>http://anothernicole.com/2012/05/22/how-to-ride-all-the-rides-in-disneyland-in-a-day/#comment-2022</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susanna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 06:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anothernicole.com/?p=7940#comment-2022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You make me want to be single and childless!! :) You are just awesome! Miss you! You need another UK visit. xx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make me want to be single and childless!! :) You are just awesome! Miss you! You need another UK visit. xx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A SOPA Opera by Ankita</title>
		<link>http://anothernicole.com/2011/12/16/a-sopa-opera/#comment-2019</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ankita]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anothernicole.com/?p=7046#comment-2019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This entire topic is coniusfng.  Both parties are right on their slant of this issue, kind of.  Internet companies already use online restriction to sites.  Have you ever seen the little yellow bar at the top?  My Internet firewall, Norton, would over power my web browser because the site that I was using wasn&#039;t legitimate, or so Norton deemed so.  I would have to rework my settings in my firewall and computer to allow me to  Accept,  the access to the site, which could cause viruses to my computer.  And of course it did. I know that this sounds like a conspiracy, but this is true for Hewlett Packard (I know from experience).  The computer is ruined within a year of using the web browser for illegal downloading, then in a year I have to purchase a new one.  I can guarantee that if American&#039;s were not allowed to use our computer&#039;s for what we want, we would not be able to put so much on it and ruin the hardware.  In turn, I can guarantee there will be a drop in sales with consumer grade computers.  So, I am interested in what computer companies have to say about this  problem. But on the other hand, free speech online?  That&#039;s hardly the problem.  That&#039;s just sugar coating the issue.  The problem is people not making  enough  money.  They don&#039;t care what you say or how you say it.  You can say what you want, you can download what you want, you can look at what you want, but there&#039;s a price for everything.  If you build it, they will come.  What&#039;s going to happen from all this is internet companies are going to jack up the prices, (more than the prices they are raping us with now), and then everyone can be happy.  Its going to be like advertising companies and web browsers.  The companies will keep track of computer web browsing, and what your looking at will define a price from internet companies.  Thus, if any of the  cry baby publishing companies own rights to content,  the internet companies will give a portion of their money to those other companies.  Its a win-win, and that&#039;s why we have Occupy Wall Street.  Because we  the consumer,  can&#039;t get ahead, only major corporations can.  Oh, what&#039;s great about this is, at least they will have an acceptance agreement  but who reads those anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This entire topic is coniusfng.  Both parties are right on their slant of this issue, kind of.  Internet companies already use online restriction to sites.  Have you ever seen the little yellow bar at the top?  My Internet firewall, Norton, would over power my web browser because the site that I was using wasn&#8217;t legitimate, or so Norton deemed so.  I would have to rework my settings in my firewall and computer to allow me to  Accept,  the access to the site, which could cause viruses to my computer.  And of course it did. I know that this sounds like a conspiracy, but this is true for Hewlett Packard (I know from experience).  The computer is ruined within a year of using the web browser for illegal downloading, then in a year I have to purchase a new one.  I can guarantee that if American&#8217;s were not allowed to use our computer&#8217;s for what we want, we would not be able to put so much on it and ruin the hardware.  In turn, I can guarantee there will be a drop in sales with consumer grade computers.  So, I am interested in what computer companies have to say about this  problem. But on the other hand, free speech online?  That&#8217;s hardly the problem.  That&#8217;s just sugar coating the issue.  The problem is people not making  enough  money.  They don&#8217;t care what you say or how you say it.  You can say what you want, you can download what you want, you can look at what you want, but there&#8217;s a price for everything.  If you build it, they will come.  What&#8217;s going to happen from all this is internet companies are going to jack up the prices, (more than the prices they are raping us with now), and then everyone can be happy.  Its going to be like advertising companies and web browsers.  The companies will keep track of computer web browsing, and what your looking at will define a price from internet companies.  Thus, if any of the  cry baby publishing companies own rights to content,  the internet companies will give a portion of their money to those other companies.  Its a win-win, and that&#8217;s why we have Occupy Wall Street.  Because we  the consumer,  can&#8217;t get ahead, only major corporations can.  Oh, what&#8217;s great about this is, at least they will have an acceptance agreement  but who reads those anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on small things by where the blueboots go</title>
		<link>http://anothernicole.com/2012/04/18/small-things/#comment-1998</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[where the blueboots go]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 02:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anothernicole.com/?p=7890#comment-1998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[she leaves a trail of golden dust as she steps through the air...
who wouldn&#039;t like to go where she goes! 
that brightened my evening as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>she leaves a trail of golden dust as she steps through the air&#8230;<br />
who wouldn&#8217;t like to go where she goes!<br />
that brightened my evening as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on just a note by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://anothernicole.com/2012/05/08/just-a-note/#comment-1997</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 16:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anothernicole.com/?p=7959#comment-1997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what class(es) are you taking?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what class(es) are you taking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on vs. by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://anothernicole.com/vs/#comment-1994</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 02:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anothernicole.com/?page_id=7424#comment-1994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sight vs sound (hearing)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sight vs sound (hearing)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Uncivil Servant: Thoughts on My Interview with Loretta Sanchez by Matt Payne</title>
		<link>http://anothernicole.com/2012/04/27/an-uncivil-servant-thoughts-on-my-interview-with-loretta-sanchez/#comment-1993</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Payne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 02:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anothernicole.com/?p=7912#comment-1993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My goodness, Nicole. How did Ms. Sanchez get elected to Congress eight times? It seems like most politicians would be able to fake charisma, decency, and self awareness for a few minutes at least. Keep up the good work in school.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My goodness, Nicole. How did Ms. Sanchez get elected to Congress eight times? It seems like most politicians would be able to fake charisma, decency, and self awareness for a few minutes at least. Keep up the good work in school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Uncivil Servant: Thoughts on My Interview with Loretta Sanchez by Jo Lynn Homertgen</title>
		<link>http://anothernicole.com/2012/04/27/an-uncivil-servant-thoughts-on-my-interview-with-loretta-sanchez/#comment-1992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jo Lynn Homertgen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 02:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anothernicole.com/?p=7912#comment-1992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nicole, I am not only very disappointed for you as a citizen and a woman, but I am also completely surprised. I had the opportunity multiple times to take students from Connelly to her D.C. office to meet with her while on the Close Up trip. I was always gratified by her response to us and considered her an outstanding role model. Apparently Ms. Sanchez has changed dramatically over the last few years?????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicole, I am not only very disappointed for you as a citizen and a woman, but I am also completely surprised. I had the opportunity multiple times to take students from Connelly to her D.C. office to meet with her while on the Close Up trip. I was always gratified by her response to us and considered her an outstanding role model. Apparently Ms. Sanchez has changed dramatically over the last few years?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Uncivil Servant: Thoughts on My Interview with Loretta Sanchez by Suzanne Reagan</title>
		<link>http://anothernicole.com/2012/04/27/an-uncivil-servant-thoughts-on-my-interview-with-loretta-sanchez/#comment-1991</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suzanne Reagan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 23:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anothernicole.com/?p=7912#comment-1991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, shocking, wow. At first I thought that she obviously does not have the intelligence to present a good face for an interview, so how on earth did she get elected, and then I realized that she probably just thought of you and this interview as insignificant. That is the behavior that defines her. If I lived in CA-47 I might think about working on a campaign against her, if I could find anyone worth voting for. Good job Nicole!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, shocking, wow. At first I thought that she obviously does not have the intelligence to present a good face for an interview, so how on earth did she get elected, and then I realized that she probably just thought of you and this interview as insignificant. That is the behavior that defines her. If I lived in CA-47 I might think about working on a campaign against her, if I could find anyone worth voting for. Good job Nicole!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on bangs by esther</title>
		<link>http://anothernicole.com/2012/05/01/bangs/#comment-1987</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[esther]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 18:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anothernicole.com/?p=7930#comment-1987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I ever decide to get bangs, I&#039;ll let you know how fun they are. #loveya]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I ever decide to get bangs, I&#8217;ll let you know how fun they are. #loveya</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

