where my feet are

The other day, I was sitting and talking to some of my classmates (I’m back in school) before class started; they were talking about their weekends and plans and so forth, and I had the strangest feeling. There was something different about this conversation, something unusual. I wasn’t able to pinpoint it immediately, but as I kept listening to them, it became clear to me.

They weren’t escaping Anaheim/Orange. And they weren’t complaining.

Their plans were full of local activities and events, but with no snide undertones of discontent. And I realized—this part hit me like the proverbial brick—that I’ve never spent much time with people who don’t hate this part of Orange County… It was utterly refreshing, inspiring, beguiling even.

When I first moved to California in 1991, I was furious about having to leave my friends and home in Texas, and it took me years to get over hating the state as a whole. I was at public school that first year, then home schooled for junior high (and still angry at CA), and then I went to an all-girls prep school for high school. Although the school itself is in north Orange County, the girls were, by and large, from south county—which is like a whole other country. They were wealthy, privileged, and most of them wouldn’t have ever thought of hanging out in this area. I never got a chance to take off my blue-tinted glasses, if you will (grey-tinted might be even better).

When I moved back to this area after college, I was at a post-grad program full of people who hated Anaheim. That was when I first began defending the town. It’s not Paris, or LA, or even Boston or Austin, but it’s a regular small city. It has good facilities. It has libraries and parks, and Starbucks and McDonald’s. And, ok, it has some problems, too (where doesn’t?). Still, though I was on the defense, I think that deep down, I believed the thing I was defending needed my defense. And it’s hard to learn to like something you’re only defending—especially if you’re always around people who are vitriolic in their discontent.

But now, I find my new friends inspire me. I don’t know if they love it here, and I don’t know if it’s their favorite place—but they’re content. They don’t spend their time hating on the place. They don’t spend their weekends escaping. They spend them enjoying where they are and what they have. And they have great stories about the local lives they live.

I’m not saying Anaheim is my favorite city now; I know it has its faults. And, c’mon, I’ve lived in Austin, London, Greece, and Boston, so I know a good city when I see it. But I do covet my new friends’ contentment, and it’s inspired me to find it myself.

I went to the grocery store the other day with a newly-awakened sense of community. These people are my neighbors. They play at the same park; they use the same library. There’s something here to appreciate—my classmates have found it. And I’m tired of only following in the haters’ footsteps. Maybe it’s time to give this area an honest try. (I know, I know: ’bout time!). I expect that, at some point in my life, I’ll have to live somewhere else I dislike—so I might as well start learning how to like where I am. Yes, home is where your heart is, but there’s a lot to be said for making it where your feet are, too.

postscript

this is a bit of a postscript to my post “in my heart” :

a friend of mine, also living in a town that she didn’t originally call “home,” and i got a in a little discussion about our thoughts on home and towns we love and this sort of thing. in light of that discussion, and sanae’s comment on my post, i had a few more thoughts i wanted to let loose.

(if you have thoughts along this line, i would love to hear them. most of you guys have moved at least a few times, and i’m terribly fascinated by the idea of home. perhaps i have been ever since i learned that there was a book called You Can’t Go Home Again. it’s by thomas wolfe, and i’ve never read it, actually, because i think deep down i’m afraid he might be right).

sanae noted (quite perceptively, i thought) that sometimes what we love about a place, what we think has put it in our hearts, is really just memories — and as much as we love those, they are a part of our past. but we’re always relocated to create new memories. she ends with “if the austin chapter isn’t closed, it’s just been relocated, perhaps.”

i thought about that quite a bit. and to some extent, yes, i believe she is right. maybe we can’t go home again because “home” never exists as it was. i remember moving to bible school, and calling a friend and saying how much i missed austin. and she told me that what i really missed was the years i had spent in austin, and those had changed. everyone had graduated and moved, and even if i were to come back to austin, it would not be the same austin i recalled. that’s definitely something to consider.

but i think my feelings for towns run deeper than just their memories. i’m getting increasingly fond of the idea that i carry towns with me – in pockets and in my heart. i told sanae that, yes, austin is a part of my past — but since it has shaped me so much, it’s also a part of my present.

what’s the difference then — between towns i carry in my heart, like austin, and towns i carry in my pocket – london, the cambridges.

i think it is this — austin is so much a part of me — of how i define myself and how i want to be able to define myself, that i consider it carried in my heart. in some ways, i’ll consider myself an austinite no matter how long i’m gone for, and no matter how infrequently i return. when i am there, i belong there. and when i am not there, when people mention it or tell stories about it, i still know that i belong there. it is my town they speak of. i carry it in my heart. and i carry its heart in my heart — not just its memories; something of its essence is etched in my being.

but london i carry in my pocket. its a part of me, and i love it, and when i go back i feel comfortable and excited and it just fits… but im not a londoner. i tell people, with pride, that i lived there, and i love going back. i always want to go back. but it is like this i think: once i was a part of london, and i love that — but london is not really a part of me. not like austin.

im not sure what kind of keeping i will do with boston/cambridge — right now it is in my pocket — perhaps one day it will be in my heart, too.

in response to this train of thought, a friend offered some insight a coworker had given her: “there are many forms of the ideal place we call home.”

maybe home is an idea in our head, and the towns that fit it best get carried in our hearts. and the rest makes us happy, and we love it, but never quite defines us.

home again, home again (jiggity jog)

wandering through the austin airport:

i’ve walked through this airport so many times. if i want to, i can tell myself this is the same as usual — an arrival home on a late flight, the airport poised to close, the restaurants barred up, only the one gift shop still lit. TSA official huddled as the last group of arriving passengers trudge, exhausted, down the corridor.

but i’m a visitor now. and while i feel like a prodigal, returning, the thought tugs that there is no home waiting. there is only a borrowed bed now, under another’s roof.

its a sad thought at first, but the trouble is, i mostly feel like julie andrews in The Sound of Music: i want to swing my suitcase around me, dancing as i walk, belting out with “I have confidence that spring will come again / despite what you see, i have confidence in me.”

visitor or not, i’m still home. i think i could live in hundreds of places, return here a thousand times, and still feel like every time is charged with the solace and relief that comes from coming home.

austin

i’m back in austin — just for a week — a mini-break — and it still feels like i home. i love this town.

so far i’ve eaten at kerbey lane (cowboy queso, o how i have missed you) and schlotsky’s. i’ve been here about 18 hours. more to come.

oh yeah i’ve also eaten some tums.