Tag Archives: media

keeping up with…everything other than the kardashians: a few tips for following current events

I wouldn’t say I get this question a lot, but it has come up several times in the past few months: friends asking me how I keep up with current events and how they, too, can get in on that. Most of the time, the question comes with a sense of frustration or overwhelmedness; there is so much news media out there, where does one even start? And I have been thinking about my answer to this query—when did I decide to try and keep up with the news? And how did I go about it? I remember being completely baffled by all the options and being convinced that, no matter how much I read, I would never really be “in the know” because there was just too much to know.

I would say the first step is to stop thinking like that. It’s true that there is a ridiculous amount of information out there, but knowing what’s going on around you doesn’t preclude reading it all. In fact, for the most part, news sources are all presenting the exact same events (just with different biases, perspectives, and agendas).

The second step is to find one news source you like. Just one. Really. If you have strong political/social views, you might want to pick a site that best correlates with them (liberal media can be really frustraying/annoying to staunch conservatives—and vice versa, I am sure). If you are, as I am, more or less a centrist, you can choose from either side and just try to keep a healthy perspective. Do be aware that most media is liberal. It’s the nature of the beast. When it comes to picking your source, I would say start with a big name paper/site; they usually have the most access to information, better writing/editing standards, and a tradition of accuracy. (I’ll get into specifics about different sources further down).

Once you’ve picked a source, make yourself check it every day or so (almost every major news outlet has an app for cell phones, so that’s a good way to sort of keep it around if you aren’t tethered to a desk—and thus, the internet—all day). Even if all you do is skim the homepage, build this into your routine! Skimming the front page of a newspaper is a great way to get acquainted with things, and news media is designed with all the important stuff appearing first. So even if you read just a headline and a few sentences, you can get the general gist of things. You may not know whether or not we should be at war, but you will at least know we are.

And then, as time allows, read articles that interest you. If you don’t have a clear sense of your interests yet, just read what catches your eye. Don’t worry—the media is designed to hook you in :) And also, don’t worry about reading everything. If you take the time to skim the homepage, you’ll get a general overview of what’s going on out there. There’s no need to know all the finer points about everything. You’ll have your areas of interest, and people you know will have other areas of interest. Converse. Talking about the news is a great way to keep up with it :)

The most important thing to do as you are skimming and reading is think. The media is not the voice of God. It was not handed down to Moses on the Mount. While the major sites can be trusted to (more or less) accurately present the historical information of a situation, they are unabashed in their biases (which means that the facts they include and exclude are very telling). A healthy dose of cynicism is a must when reading the news. It’s okay to read an article and disagree.

If, after a while, you find yourself always disagreeing with what you read or often frustrated with the articles, it’s probably time to find a new media source. That was my experience with CNN. I started trying to get into the news by reading cnn.com. It worked great—CNN has a wide range of coverage that I appreciated then (and I still do). But they have a few persistent undertones that I didn’t like, and after a while, it was more than I could handle. So now I read the New York Times. NYT is far more liberal than I am, but as long as I bear that in mind, I’m pretty happy with their reporting. And they have David Brooks :)

The more you read your one source, the more you may want to read other perspectives on the same topic. Is the recession really in recovery? Maybe your source says yes, but you wonder. So dig around—try another site, see what they say. Balance the views. Sometimes all I read is a bunch of articles on one single issue. Other times, I just skim a few homepages and stop there.

That’s really all there is to it. If you start small, skim the headlines, and then follow up on what interests you, you’ll find that you are “in the know” before too long. The nice thing about news is that it changes every day—so you can always jump right in and be up to date before very long!

Sidebar: Choosing a News Source

I had a lot of  trouble trying to find a news source originally. I wanted something conservative—but not extremely so. Any cynic will tell you, there’s just not a lot of conservative media out there. But thanks to the internet machine, there is more than there used to be. Here’s a few tips (just from my experience; and I really am not an expert):

Conservative News Sources

The National Review Online is probably the most mainstream conservative site. It’s not moderate. It’s very conservative—sometimes its too much for me. BUT they do have an awesome string of links on their front page that I love to click through (links from other sites and writers).

The Wall Street Journal is a little funny. People will tell you it’s conservative, and it is, but that’s mostly because it’s a business paper. It’s fiscally conservative. But I’ve found that the WSJ staff articles tend to be socially liberal; the op-eds and contributed pieces are definitely conservative, though, and I often find gems in there.

I don’t read The Chicago Tribune, or The New York Post, but both of them are historically conservative (for what that’s worth).

Liberal News Sources

As said, my go-to source is the New York Times—which is, without question, liberal media. However, the writing is good and their reputation for accuracy is solid. Anyway, yes, I read NYT, but sometimes I head over to National Review Online to balance things out a little, too.

Other than NYT, I don’t follow liberal media; but if that is where you lean, you might want to try: The Washington Post, USA Today, or the Los Angeles Times. (I hate the LA Times, for what it’s worth.)

Other News Sources

CNN and Huffington Post lean to the left, but (whether intentionally or not), they tend to be more moderate than the aforementioned liberal sources.

BBC News America and The Economist are British productions that also offer a good perspective (I wouldn’t make a foreign source my one and only source, but they are great resources, nonetheless).

Magazines like Time, Newsweek, US News & World Report usually also have good articles, but since they aren’t published daily, I wouldn’t rely on them as heavily. Plus, they tend to be public-interest-oriented. So you get one or two articles on the week’s hottest stories—which is a good way to supplement your primary source sometimes—but may leave out other stories that you should know about it.

And there’s always The Onion—which, as many of you know, is America’s finest news source.

sometimes you need an umbrella

and sometimes you need corel draw x5.

i went to bed last night completely on media/internet/input overload… i couldn’t quite find words to express my frustration, but within a few minutes i had an image in my head… i went to bed increasingly frustrated, though, because i couldn’t seem to capture the image the way i wanted to with pencil and paper.

so this morning, i downloaded the 30-day free trial of corel’s new draw x5 suite. bingo.

a few hours later (yes, it took me forever, i know. but this is the first time i’ve used corel in FOREVER…and i was stuck with whatever fonts i had on my lil computer), i worked all that angst out. aaaaaaahhhhhh :)

the vitaminwater debaucle

one of the benefits of being abroad for so long is that i’m decently able to tune out the dull hum of american media when and if i want to. i mean, i guess i can do that at home, too, but it’s easier to here. but at least, the winds of scandal have reached me and i’ve just finished reading up on the vitaminwater lawsuit. forgive me if my reaction is a bit delayed.

forgive me, also, if my reaction is nothing short of absolute and incredulous scorn. for the plaintiffs. i’m absolutely appalled that they would be suing vitaminwater. that in a world where 1 in 8 americans goes hungry, our food advocacy groups are spending money attacking a branding issue.

let me just say this: vitamin water is not healthy. and if you thought so, i’m sorry, but the fault is yours. i hate to be so blunt and i hate to sound harsh, but i just cannot get my head around this. the government requires food products to contain a standardized nutritional label, and vitamin water is no exception. they are labeled. it’s no secret that drinking one is about the same as having a soft drink. and if you were fooled by the colorful ads, the labels and the bold print, that’s not exactly a crime. that’s what advertising does — it highlights a tiny part of a product to outshine the rest of it. if you live in america, you should be used to that by now. you should be used to the idea that advertisements aren’t telling you the truth.

this issue highlights an even greater illness in our culture: that of believing the media, believing advertising. i mean, really, come on! just because it’s called vitaminwater does not mean it’s healthy. oh yes, there are vitamins infused into it. an itty-bitty amount, so its not an all-out lie, but still.

we don’t need to waste time trying to reform the media (it won’t work). we need to invest efforts into teaching people to read the media. stop the incessant hand-holding; start equipping. we don’t need to sue everyone who seems sly. we need to educate everyone to see through it.

i’m livid. i expect i’ll revise this tomorrow. check back then for a kinder version.

[edit: i didn't have the energy to rewrite this after all, but let me just add this: i do understand that the vitaminwater labels were particularly devious, and i don't think it's uncommon to have been fooled by them. i don't think the people who were fooled are stupid or anything like that. i just think we need to be a little savvier as a society. and i don't think this misrepresentation warrants a lawsuit -- let's spend the time, money and energy that goes into this kind of lawsuit to do more preventative work -- education and awareness of media, etc.]

straight up now tell me

Posted on

one time (and perhaps more than that), when i was a kid, my brothers and i got into this enormous fight. it was pretty bad, and i only remember that it must have been so bad because all four of us were involved. as a general rule, we fought one-against-one, or at least didn’t embroil my youngest brother (who was probably 3 at the time) in our heated debates.

but this time it was bad, whatever it was about, and there was all sort of chaotic energy flailing through the house, and so my father sent each of us into a separate room. four rooms, four children. and one by one, he came by, sat us down and asked to hear our account of the events. he explained that, since three other people would also be testifying, if we made stuff up, it would come out pretty quick. and since nothing inspires honesty like the surety of being caught lying, i guess we all reported things as truthfully as possible.

if only the media in this country could be held so accountable. today, in an effort to find out what really happened with israel and that flotilla (and by the way, what is a flotilla? cos that word makes me hungry), i found myself combing through so many news websites just to get the facts. the media was lightning-quick to condemn israel’s actions, but when i tried to find out what actually happened, it wasn’t so easy as first… and then as i began to get the bits of facts i could, i was even more confused… i understand that all facts are seen through some bias, that pure facts actually don’t even exist… and yet… there are definite degrees of that, and i don’t the media should make it so hard to find the truth. i want to know what happened and make up my own mind. i don’t want the wolf blitzers and rupert murdochs of this world telling me what to think (i saw newsies often enough as a kid to know how those guys work.)

so i began digging, just trying to see what exactly happened. amid the myriad of condemnations and outraged articles, i found hints and flecks of another set of facts… one line that implies that maybe israel had some legitimate concerns… ok lets look into that… oh wait this site begrudgingly admits israel may not have done what a prisoner said they did… and this site hints that israel might have grounds to be concerned about those flotillas (flotillae?)… and this site thinks we should burn israel to the ground… no one sanctions raiding aid boats… but a direct quote from the flotilla people says they weren’t an aid boat, that they were trying to break israel’s blockade against Gaza… then i learn that israel offered to deliver the humanitarian goods themselves, once they had examined them for weapons… i  find accounts that allow that, yes, israel was attacked first when boarding the flotilla….that the two men who were killed had pulled weapons on the israeli soldiers first… that israel has to right to have a blockade there… and another site can understand why they do — its a regime dedicated to ridding the world of israel… that some prisoners, when offered water, refused to drink any because the labels were in hebrew. i think we cannot understand the level of hatred that exists between these two peoples… it seems the one thing every single article agrees on is that israel was incredibly stupid, and that attacking aid ships is never going to win friends in the international community. definitely agree with that.

there’s no denying that israel made a huge mistake – on multiple levels. but i still can’t help feeling like there might be more than 1 side to this story, that there might be more facts lurking somewhere… if only we could hold the media accountable as easily as four bickering children.

i would hardly call the following articles “facts,” but amidst the varying opinions, here’s a few things i found. i tried to steer away from sheer outraged articles, since i figured we’ve all read those already. if you haven’t, you should start there.

Reuters – Israel Deports Flotilla Activists After World Outcry (scroll down for the account of events)

NYTimes Blog – The Shock Heard Round The World

Foreign Policy – Steven Walt’s Blog – Israel’s Latest Brutal Blunder

MSNBC – Israeli Commandos Describe Raid

MSNBC – Bloody Israeli Raid on Flotilla Sparks Crisis

jon and kate plus 9.8 million viewers

Posted on

i was reading this article today about the gosselin family, and the article asked if jon and kate should the show because it’s now become a big circus about their marriage and is it fair to put their kids at the center of it, are they exploiting their kids, etc. ya know. the usual. and anyway at the time of writing this, there are no less than 400 comments on that article, almost all of which advise that jon and kate should indeed stop the show, blaming them for putting their kids in a media circus, and being horrible parents etc.

and i didn’t read all the comments, because after a while i just can’t stomach what people write in comments (tangent: i read somewhere that when invented, the internet was hailed as being to give us all a voice; and now, we realize that that meant all those people you didn’t want to listen to could talk as much as they wanted) — but let me just say this — the comments i did read seemed remarkably well-informed about jon and kate plus 8 and 9.8 million people watched the season premiere…

yeah if you’re so against what they’re doing — stop watching their show for pete’s sake!

no one does righteous indignation like americans. we’ll judge the wazoo out of you while selling tickets to the show.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 125 other followers